THiiiNksail - The Energy Fan

Energy as a resource, both present and future

THiiiNksail

See @THiiiNksail on Twitter.com

Topic Activity:

  1. biomass 29, most recently on 24 February 2017
  2. wind power 14, most recently on 20 February 2017
  3. wind energy 11, most recently on 15 February 2017
  4. nuclear power 9, most recently on 28 January 2017
  5. hydro power 6, most recently on 19 January 2017
  6. sustainable energy 6, most recently on 26 January 2017
  7. carbon emissions 5, most recently on 11 February 2017
  8. renewable energy 2, most recently on 27 November 2016
  9. geothermal power 1, most recently on 02 August 2016
  10. coal power 1, most recently on 10 May 2016
  1. In biomass Milliard Bedrageri! https://t.co/yxLWgIox89 https://t.co/dSL7jyEcHC @tv2newsdk @okologidk @berlingske @jyllandsposten @borsendk #dkgreen on 24 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  2. In wind power The WORLDBANK needs to act Greenpeace & Co = Total Destruction?https://t.co/9jGQet6VrS https://t.co/k2epwBI28c @WorldBank @UNEP @COP22_NEWS on 20 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  3. In biomass Denmark State of SOOT Burning GREEN TREES with No Co2 Reduction? https://t.co/9jGQetowQs https://t.co/Mebug4pjpQ @Britanniacomms @BBCWorld on 18 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  4. In biomass Denmark State of SOOT Burning GREEN TREES with No Co2 Reduction? https://t.co/7AumuiPipa https://t.co/Mebug4pjpQ @washingtonpost @Reuters on 18 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  5. In biomass Denmark a State of SOOT & Burning of GREEN TREES with TWICE the Co2?https://t.co/9jGQetowQs https://t.co/dSL7jyEcHC @COP22_NEWS @UNEP @WSJ on 18 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  6. In biomass Why is USA Greener than Denmark = Burning Trees = More Co2? https://t.co/fPP6T85p9l @denmarkdotdk @WorldBank @ShellenbergerMD @FT #dkgreen on 17 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  7. In biomass Why is USA Greener than DK = Denmark burns US Trees? https://t.co/Mebug47I1g @denmarkdotdk @WorldBank #GreenTransition @ShellenbergerMD @FT on 17 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  8. In biomass Danes are smart by not burning Coal they can double Co2 output by burning Green Trees? https://t.co/fPP6T85p9l @OperadorNuclear @tv2newsdk on 17 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  9. In biomass No No in Denmark 2 be Green? is burning Biomass or Green trees 2 be worse than Coal? https://t.co/dSL7jymBj2 @OperadorNuclear @tv2newsdk on 17 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  10. In biomass The Danish model is WRONG = Energy from burning Trees = More Co2 Not Less?https://t.co/fPP6T8n0xV @denmarkdotdk @WorldBank #GreenTransition on 17 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  11. In biomass HOW can Denmark be Green? if the Danish model Biomass, is worse than Coal? https://t.co/dSL7jyEcHC @denmarkdotdk @WorldBank #GreenTransition on 17 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  12. In biomass HOW can Denmark be Green? if the Energy is from burning American Trees? https://t.co/Mebug4pjpQ @denmarkdotdk @WorldBank #GreenTransition on 17 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  13. In biomass Denmark is Green HOW impossible? Energy is from burning our Green Trees? https://t.co/fPP6T8n0xV @denmarkdotdk @WorldBank #GreenTransition on 17 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  14. In biomass Greenpeace Windsolar on 65% Trees STOP Arctic Melt?https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/Yb889UAvdn https://t.co/Mebug4pjpQ on 17 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  15. In wind power Greenpeace Windsolar on 65% Trees STOP Arctic Melt?https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/Yb889UAvdn https://t.co/Mebug4pjpQ @WorldBank @theGE on 15 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  16. In biomass Drax Energy cost 7% of the worlds pristine forrest? https://t.co/Yb889UAvdn https://t.co/dSL7jyEcHC https://t.co/TtxujXjOSD @Draxnews on 13 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  17. In biomass Drax Energy is 65% of our Green Trees for charging IPHONES?https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/dSL7jyEcHC https://t.co/Mebug4pjpQ @Draxnews on 13 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  18. In biomass Drax More Polluting Than Coal 65% EU Energy is our Green Trees Drax Deforestation? https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/dSL7jyEcHC @Draxnews on 13 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  19. In carbon emissions Save Nature with 100% #Wind #Solar? https://t.co/LqAck2OpXY https://t.co/Yb889UAvdn https://t.co/eAh4nXjpHc @TEDTalks @DRNyheder @tv2newsdk on 11 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  20. In carbon emissions 100% WindSolar would EQUAL the biggest destruction of Nature in history? https://t.co/LqAck2OpXY @TEDTalks @DRNyheder @tv2newsdk #dkgreen on 11 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  21. In biomass Ineffective WindSolar on 65% Trees Biomass = Trees worse than Coal Plants? https://t.co/dSL7jyEcHC @TEDTalks @DRNyheder @tv2newsdk #dkgreen on 10 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  22. In wind energy Denmark & Germany the Leaders of 24/7 Agressive Global Deforestation? https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/K3YcE5Gf6V @jthorese @dagbladet on 02 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  23. In wind energy Danish & German #wind #Solar Lead to Agressive Global Deforestation? https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/TtxujXjOSD @jthorese @dagbladet on 02 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  24. In biomass Coal is bad" ineffective #wind #solar on Trees is even worse? https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/dSL7jyEcHC @ecocouncil_dk @concitoinfo on 02 February 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  25. In wind power Germans finally realizing it's hard to use renewables to power system? https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/k1il12tx3x @business @COP22_NEWS on 30 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  26. In biomass Climate Change = Greenpeace #wind #solar Using Trees 2 charge IPHONES https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/Mebug4pjpQ @business @COP22_NEWS on 30 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  27. In wind power #wind #solar 4 Climate? Supply chain SOOT melts the ice much faster? https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/DkSpy9YNq2 @business @COP22_NEWS on 30 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  28. In biomass Right it's so Embarrassing we in the EU use American Trees 2 charge IPHONES? https://t.co/Mebug4pjpQ @business @COP22_NEWS @ClimateCentral on 29 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  29. In biomass Trump Coal a bad idea" EU Cutting American Trees 4 Energy is that any better? https://t.co/Mebug4pjpQ @business @COP22_NEWS @ClimateCentral on 29 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  30. In wind power Rapid food shortage is 100% plausible = the Curve ball?https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/qWqhvcSQIq @business @COP22_NEWS @ClimateCentral on 29 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  31. In wind power Most fail to see rapid food shortage is 100% plausible?https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/vZwkQ1enNh @business @COP22_NEWS @ClimateCentral on 29 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  32. In wind power Ineffective #wind #Solar is 65% Trees?https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/K3YcE5Gf6V @ShellenbergerMD @business @COP22_NEWS @ClimateCentral on 29 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  33. In wind power Greenpeace fighting a #Nuclear Sun with #wind #Solar = Death of Ocean, Earth + our Children? https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/sDaF8uryOf on 29 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  34. In wind power Inconvenient Truth it took Greenpeace only 50 years 2 destroy Earth https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/PrwGzr0vIb https://t.co/jx4mmV4mBj on 29 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  35. In wind power An Inconvenient Truth Greenpeace has mislead the Green Movement 2 destroy Earth & Oceans? https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/RztDtJgHvK on 29 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  36. In wind power Inconvenient Truth 50 years = Ineffective #Wind #Solar = Catastrophe?https://t.co/PrwGzr0vIb https://t.co/JLVm2iaags https://t.co/GUcu1ugPPC on 29 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  37. In nuclear power Inconvenient Truth Ineffective #wind #Solar totally Unsustainable?https://t.co/ZJ5DNymCz6 https://t.co/JLVm2iaags @guardian @IRENA #nuclear on 28 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  38. In biomass Inconvenient Truth Ineffective #wind #Solar = Burn our Trees 24/7= A World mislead by Greenpeace? https://t.co/Mebug4pjpQ @IRENA #nuclear on 28 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  39. In sustainable energy I liked a @YouTube video https://t.co/xsjASRpXqu TEDxWarwick - David MacKay - How the Laws of Physics Constrain Our Sustainable Energy on 26 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  40. In biomass Denmark & Germany the leaders in Agressive Global Deforestation? https://t.co/Mebug4pjpQ @ClimateCentral @washingtonpost @larsclilleholt on 24 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  41. In hydro power Everything we think is Clean is not Clean at all = Forget Hydro Power = More Co2? https://t.co/fXfYYxFroU @LeoDiCaprio @NaomiAKlein @WSJ on 19 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  42. In hydro power Everything we think is Clean is not Clean at all = Forget Hydro Power = Billion tons more of Co2? https://t.co/fXfYYxFroU @WRIClimate @FT on 19 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  43. In hydro power Everything we think is Clean is not Clean at all = Forget Hydro Power = Billion tons more of Co2? https://t.co/fXfYYxFroU @UNFCCC @CFigueres on 19 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  44. In biomass The Real Horror Story of Ineffective Greenpeace WindSolar 4 Electricity EU WindSolar is US TREES? https://t.co/Mebug4pjpQ @WRIClimate @FT on 19 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  45. In biomass The Real Horror Story of Ineffective WindSolar 4 Electricity EU WindSolar = US TREES? https://t.co/Mebug4pjpQ @LeoDiCaprio @NaomiAKlein @WSJ on 19 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  46. In hydro power Everything we think is Clean is not Clean at all = Forget Hydro Power = Billion tons more of Co2? https://t.co/fXfYYxFroU @markriceoxley69 on 19 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  47. In hydro power Everything we think is Clean is not Clean at all = Forget Hydro Power = More Co2? https://t.co/fXfYYxFroU @ShellenbergerMD @dbiello @sciam on 19 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  48. In biomass The situation is so bad that the EU Needs US Trees for Energy = How many Russian Trees are burned? https://t.co/Mebug4pjpQ @WRIClimate on 18 January 2017 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  49. In sustainable energy WindSolar + NUKE backup ASAP https://t.co/mJ2rzhN0S3 @CFigueres @COP22_NEWS @TheClimDatFac @LeoDiCaprio @UNFCCC @RobertDowneyJr @SamAdamsWRI on 05 December 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  50. In nuclear power Finland raises its bet on nuclear power https://t.co/8nVHfneGvr via @FT on 28 November 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  51. In renewable energy WindSolar = Poverty https://t.co/0iACh2T2CF https://t.co/06P9jwPDKN @SamAdamsWRI @COP22_NEWS @LeoDiCaprio @CFigueres @UNEP @NaomiAKlein @FT on 27 November 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  52. In wind energy So The more Wind Turbines the Danes BUILD = Less Social Welfare Less Education Less free Healthcare..:( https://t.co/AEwP3I6F4z @COP22_NEWS on 19 November 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  53. In carbon emissions Without 'negative emissions, future generations face costs that become to heavy to bear https://t.co/qGAHzNlVQC @CNBC @business @G20portal on 14 October 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  54. In nuclear power Can our need for a carbon-free future override our fears of nuclear energy? https://t.co/WW19TDvcjT on 14 September 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  55. In renewable energy WindSolar = Final Death Blow 2 US Economy.? https://t.co/06P9jwPDKN https://t.co/0iACh2T2CF @theresa_may @nickhurdmp https://t.co/NO8RSM6mMB on 14 September 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  56. In sustainable energy Can our need for a carbon-free future override our fears of nuclear energy? https://t.co/WW19TDMNbr @business @CNBC @FT on 14 September 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  57. In wind power Hybrid Wind Power = Safety at Sea using existing technologies.! = Using 5 existing things.? https://t.co/Tsm3CXU1Pa https://t.co/DJN87hMVOi on 03 September 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  58. In nuclear power Why is CarbonBubble not taking options PRISM? @CarbonBubble @ECIU_UK https://t.co/EcKzJLCNi5 https://t.co/0iACh2T2CF https://t.co/Ha1Ns2xepv on 26 August 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  59. In carbon emissions Why aren't ships using wind-power 16 years of MAERSK SABOTAGE..! https://t.co/M8ARKiZvyA https://t.co/Imf6affNam https://t.co/5oKUUmZcOg on 21 August 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  60. In nuclear power "For decades the Russian and the US navy have been using carbon free ships, they are called nuclear power. Using..." https://t.co/bJh4Sqd0MD on 21 August 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  61. In carbon emissions "In addition to Russian ice breakers three other merchant ships have been built viz. the Savannah (USA); Mutsu(J..." https://t.co/BJoBie5rEq on 19 August 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  62. In wind energy UK Wind ? Will be a NGO driven financial disaster just like in Germany cost of energy will keep going up not down? https://t.co/G3dCtxCLvO on 16 August 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  63. In nuclear power James Lovelock: Nuclear power is the only green solution https://t.co/YbqcdzXAn8 on 05 August 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  64. In sustainable energy Sustainable Energy - Without the Hot Air with David MacKay https://t.co/xPdT2qoUKo on 04 August 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  65. In wind energy Global Wind Investors must be REFUNDED.? Germany's Green Energy Disaster: https://t.co/3KilXiWzHe @business @CNBC https://t.co/8juF1MDz5c on 03 August 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  66. In wind energy Bernard Madoff A Hair in A Haystack compared to WIND FRAUD of epic proportions.? @MLiebreich https://t.co/1jS08R5me9 https://t.co/uCHcCO3QdH on 02 August 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  67. In geothermal power Geothermal & Nuclear only 2 that work for max power 24/7 the rest like THOR says! @livesynapses @MSR_Future @ConHome https://t.co/7NZtdll6PE on 02 August 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  68. In wind energy WIND= Coal Gas Support 24/7 @profdmcinnes https://t.co/RztDtJgHvK https://t.co/jx4mmV4mBj https://t.co/nf2ARHrl7f https://t.co/3TKe1dQnv1 on 30 July 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  69. In wind power Germany's wind power chaos should be a warning to the UK https://t.co/5fjnh6I4jg https://t.co/tmvE983I0q on 19 July 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  70. In wind energy 2 much Co2 = remove 25% Co2 REMOVE FAST is not Wind Solar No Counter Energy @ClimateCentral https://t.co/7NZtdll6PE https://t.co/QFNuEddZyK on 16 July 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  71. In nuclear power Uranium Seawater Extraction Makes Nuclear Power Completely Renewable via @forbes https://t.co/jlnsM5yt3H https://t.co/szwhsafWZT on 01 July 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  72. In wind energy There is only a small problem Wind & Solar is 75% short no energy @YEARSofLIVING @business https://t.co/7wWHYC4Y7Z https://t.co/xHUmrnJENL on 11 June 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  73. In coal power Dirty Coal Chokes the World's Most Toxic City https://t.co/6pG3zL7TjU on 10 May 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  74. In sustainable energy Tasmanian power crisis reveals urgent need for more renewable energy https://t.co/BKDrXX3l1d on 05 March 2016 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite
  75. In sustainable energy From Tesla's Powerwall to flow batteries: five facts about the energy storage revolution https://t.co/QJXqxb54q2 on 30 October 2015 » Reply » Retweet » Favorite